When I tell people that I manage community gardens, many ask me if people steal stuff that’s grown there.
Yes, sometimes they do.
Theft understandably discourages and angers gardeners. Keeping a productive garden requires work. Gardeners bend and/or get down on their hands and knees in hot, dirty conditions. While some of us mind that less than do others, all gardeners go at least a little out of their way to get to the gardens and devote time to planting, watering and weeding their garden spaces.
Bill Clinton is extremely phony. I’ve seldom taken seriously what he has said. But after 9/11, when asked if the world would soon descend into chaos, Clinton expressed, in a few words, a very big idea. He opined that chaos would not ensue because “Most people are builders.”
Most people are striving for something, whether material, experiential, interpersonal/familial or spiritual; or some combination of these. Chasing dreams is, by far and for most people, more motivational than are various destructive impulses. It makes the world go around. Paradoxically, allowing people to pursue their own dreams holds the world together. Though, of course, dreams sometimes collide and there must be some limits.
Growing stuff entails envisioning how the seeds you plant will, given care and sun and rain, turn into tasty and nutritious vegetables or fruits or beautiful flowers. Without this motivation, most people wouldn’t garden; the gardening process is enjoyable for most people, but this enjoyment is inextricably bound to expectation.
Yesterday, when I arrived very early at the gardens, I saw someone whom I didn’t recognize cutting, i.e., stealing flowers. I’ve seen evidence of theft many times before but I had never caught a person taking stuff.
Since I’m the one who plants most of the flowers and I look forward to how they will, when in bloom, look to the many people who visit or pass our site each day, seeing someone steal flowers displeased me; I saw the stealer as a representative for all others who had previously taken stuff, undetected. I approached her and told her that, by taking the flowers and bringing them home, she was depriving many people from seeing the flowers and was disrespecting the work I had done to plan, plant and care for the flowers. As I continued to speak and walk toward her, she scurried away.
This experience made me think more about continuing to provide free Substack (or, before that Medium) content, as I have for most of the past three years. Work deserves respect. The Internet has fostered the dysfunctional expectation that stuff should be free. There’s something displeasing about being taken for granted.
I won’t say much more regarding the paid, cf. unpaid, subscriptions. But going forward, most of my posts will be for paid subscribers. People should be willing to support what they value. Thankfully, many have.
Following/during a period in which the Med/Pharma and government-funded media has consistently, purposefully and audaciously misrepresented all things Corona/Covid—and thereby, misled billions of gullible people—the importance of alternative, truthful media, and the need to support such media, should speak for itself. But just in case, I’m saying so directly. If you think my four posts/month are worth less than a latte, I won’t try to change your mind.
I’ll post again, on-message, tomorrow.
I think the Comments below are interesting. I stand by my responses.
Your point is understandable but I don't love this metaphor. I find it incoherent.
Offering something for free- because you are emotionally satisfied by exerting societal influence through the wide spread of your ideas, or simply to be generous- is different from having something stolen from you.
Allowing those who can't or won't pay for a subscription to read articles doesn't deprive others from reading them.
Your real conflict here seems to be with VALUE, specifically the value YOU extract from the maintenance of your Substack garden. What I suspect is happening is that you're conflicted, or no longer satisfied, with the non-monetary value of your garden, and suspect (rightfully) that offering it for free, past the tipping point that economists ostensibly get degrees to try to see accurately, will discourage readers who might pay for it from bothering to do so, and you'd like to extract more monetary value from your work.
That's fine. But it's different from being robbed of something of communal value. I just feel like there's room here to be more honest with yourself about your motivations.
I appreciate and understand how you feel. Substack is now one of my main resources for news and opinion, unfortunately the cost adds up quickly - imagine reading a newspaper and having to pay each reporter you read $5 per month. My pensioners budget only allows me to subscribe to around $20 per month so I have to be judicious in my selection for paid content. I have flexed over the past year once or twice depending on world events and my interests at the time. Totally understand your position and regret this will (at least for now) limit my views of your content to the free publications. Thank you for your hard work, I know it doesn't pay the bills but we do appreciate you even if we can't all afford a subscription. I look forward to your free offerings.