Weird, I must’ve missed the media’s coverage of the one millionth adverse reaction report submitted to VAERS (https://openvaers.com/covid-data) a few months ago. We’re already up to 1,261,147 as of May 6 and nearly 28,000 deaths—including 108 children (https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-summaries). I’m sure it was just an innocent oversight on the media’s part.
In England a review showed 14 different criteria were used to determine a ‘CoVid death’, depending on area and over time.
When a freedom of information request was made near the end of 2021 in England to ask how many attributed CoVid deaths where no underlying symptoms were noted, the answer was just over 17 000 for the period 01 January 2020 to 30 September 2021.
At the time supposedly 140 000 had died to date according to Govt published figures.
So by the same reckoning, probably that 1 million figure for USA is off by 90%.
It’s simple Algebra. If 100,000 people die tested for SARS-COV-2, the positivity rate is 10%. Ten thousand would count as a COVID-19 death even if they didn't have the disease. I have never seen this stat, but I bet positivity rates for people over 80 years old was closer to 50% (at times, in all age group, positivity rates were approaching 30%). Old and dying patients have a shitty immune system. So it makes sense that anyone over 80 and dying would probably test positive for a coronavirus even though they don't have the disease. Coronavirus was discovered in the ’60s. Coronavirus is likely as old as life is on the universe. The human body has millions of viruses living in our bodies. Without viruses, we couldn’t survive. A positive test confirms that PCR tests can identify a virus and multiply it thousands of times. That’s all the test does. The test cannot tell you if you have the disease COVID-19.
But here is another stat no one ever talks about. Globally almost 90% of all positive PCR tests were from the population <60 years old. Yet that age group accounted for <10% of all COVID-19 deaths. Let that sink in for a moment. Now remove pre-existing conditions from the less than 60-year-old age group. If you are healthy at any age, this virus is probably good for you. It helped create healthy antibodies for future coronavirus infections—our natural way of being vaccinated.
We can't stop here. The individuals responsible for the greatest crime against humanity in my lifetime need to be punished.
"But here is another stat no one ever talks about. Globally almost 90% of all positive PCR tests were from the population <60 years old. Yet that age group accounted for <10% of all COVID-19 deaths. Let that sink in for a moment. Now remove pre-existing conditions from the less than 60-year-old age group. If you are healthy at any age, this virus is probably good for you. It helped create healthy antibodies for future coronavirus infections—our natural way of being vaccinated."
👏👏👏👏👏
ABSOLUTELY. ALL OFFICIAL C19 COUNTERMEASURES WERE INTENDED TO HAVE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES TO RATCHET THE FEAR. The PCR TEST FRAUD is the baseless foundation of the plandemic pandemonium. The virus (if it existed before the injections) was purposely NOT ISOLATED to create the assay panels. The assay panels were purposely vague and even only used 1 of the 3 gene targets BEFORE being overclocked up to 43 cycles. Ensuring that "positive" tests would count as "cases" since seemingly the dumbest people go into public health and journalism.
...but will they? When will it start to happen.?...the cat is out of the bag, and so????.....I'm sure there is enough anger stewing amongst so many, the lid has to blow soon!
Almost no one has any idea about any of these numbers. I live in San Francisco. I ask people if they know any of this data. Nearly 100% of the people I talk to are clueless. Most people will not allow themselves to find out how stupid and gullible they are. Maybe they know, and they don't or won't ever admit it because at least they got their politician in and orange man bad out.
It is crazy, I know. I really never knew how many clueless, and disinterested people are living amongst us...it's mind-boggling. My family of origin included. My kids and I, not. Thank God...we seem to be the only ones who have any semblance of rational thought. Virtual signalling is in abundance though...yeah! ..shaking my head every day to try and make sense of it all. San Francisco is/was such an amazing city....my sister lives in CA with her her two adult kids, and again, seemingly oblivious to all this blatant nonsense. It is really stupefying.
Agreed. Fred and I discuss this daily. And they may never assimilate these facts. In fact when the opportunity arises to discuss this with people in the medical field its shocking how little known this is.
Just humour me, imagine if you will:. every media outlet in the country, right there on the screens, in unison proclames the truth (as we know it) and I see millions screaming "Nooooo" and going into melt down a la
post Trump's election. That was a picture I got after reading Eileen's and your post.
Okay, now your are just being a dipshit. Just because they were discovered in the 60s doesn’t mean they haven’t been around since the beginning of time. Modern-day study of viruses goes back only to 1892. So now you will tell me you know how old the common cold is. STFU already.
A quote from Scientific America in the early 2000s.
“ In an episode of the classic 1950s television comedy The Honeymooners, Brooklyn bus driver Ralph Kramden loudly explains to his wife, Alice, “You know that I know how easy you get the virus.” Half a century ago, even regular folks like the Kramdens had some knowledge of viruses—as microscopic bringers of disease. Yet it is almost certain that they did not know exactly what a virus was. They were, and are, not alone.
For about 100 years, the scientific community has repeatedly changed its collective mind over what viruses are. First seen as poisons, then as life-forms, then biological chemicals, viruses today are thought of as being in a gray area between living and nonliving: they cannot replicate on their own but can do so in truly living cells and can also affect the behavior of their hosts profoundly. The categorization of viruses as nonliving during much of the modern era of biological science has had an unintended consequence: it has led most researchers to ignore viruses in the study of evolution. Finally, however, scientists are beginning to appreciate viruses as fundamental players in the history of life.
No I don't want to censor you. When people deferr to ad hominem attacks what does that mean? For instance you saying that coronavirus has been around since the beginning of the universe as an example. If this virus has been around since the beginning of the Earth that is 4 billion years.
The universe is estimated at 14 billion years. There's 10 billion years unaccounted for in your explanation..
What are you talking about? The science around viruses in general is brand new. Are you suggesting that virus are something brand new as well and weren’t around prior to man. Everything I remember learning about viruses told me that they pre dated man by billions of years.
Technically they are in a gray area, and the science seems undecided on this. I hardly think getting into an argument about whether or not, in the sense of me describing viruses taking up residence (living in our bodies), is the point of what I was stating.
You said human body has millions of viruses living on it or in it. I pointed out that you're simply off by a factor of ten to the sixth when there's 380 trillion viruses on the body. There's a considerable difference between millions and 380 trillion. I need to do more fact-checking before writing. That's all I'm pointing out. You'll have much more credibility if you do
Thanks. next time, I will make sure I'm more precise.
I was trying to say millions of different viruses, not the overall quantity of viruses. Perhaps you should read what Wolfgang Wodarg has to say about viruses. Then maybe you will understand the point I was trying to make.
Nothing Grey about them being alive. At least according to a talk I heard today by Matt ridley and his new book. Be more precise in your words especially if u want to talk science.
90% of all positive SARS-COV-2 tests were in less than 60 years old demographics. Yet that age group only accounted for ~10% of all the deaths (but many of these deaths were likely due to the person was already sick and unhealthy and they probably died from smothering else). That's all I was trying to convey.
I would like to know the positivity rate for the age group over 80 years old. If anyone has that data I would love to see it.
If you look outside of the US or you look in San Francisco the number of deaths <60 years old is maybe 2-3% if that. San Francisco is a small city and I would venture to say we have an extremely healthy and in shape population. The rent and mortgage payments alone will scare you into staying fit. 😊
Yep. You're looking for good data. Me too. It's a bit awesome to find we are of global significance isn't it? i.e. if you or I were to come up with a definitive list of reliable sources for covid data that'd be the first. Wow. I better start trying. I keep expecting someone else to do it for me....
I'm just over it. I spent way too many hours for almost eighteen months pouring over the data and reading peer-reviewed scientific articles. I couldn't believe how many people in my immediate circle were so naive about what was happening. At this point, we will never know how many of the old and the sick did we push to their death beds too early because of the draconian measures the government enforced upon us. I personally believe most of them died a broken heart and from the government instilled fear they were under. But it makes sense that a large percent of these deaths were just pulled forward. In other words people who probably only had 12-18 months to live anyway.
We will have to see if the excess death numbers will adjust in the next couple of years. If they do, it should be fairly clear to see that the government interventions were the problem, not the virus. The problem is now healthy people less than 60 seem to be dropping dead at a furious rate. So this could potentially keep the excess numbers high. So it will be more critical to stratify the excess death numbers by age.
The primary mechanisms of harm were the official government interventions. Many countries have already gone back and adjudicated their deaths considerably lowering those attributed to actual C19. Even in doing so they are largely, if not primarily, scooping normal respiratory distress deaths due to comorbidities in to C19 containers. Age stratification still paints a clear but less and less so picture due to ACM impacts of the most dangerous medical product in history.
America was victimized by the biggest con in world history.
Question: Where do we go from here now that we see that the elites are not letting it go, but instead, they are using the waning pandemic as a spring board to enact broad social controls.
This aspect must now be recognized, challenged and defeated.
SCOTUS will now have its most solemn duty ever to reverse this authoritarian over-reach.
At this point it's hurting men who have sex with other men. It's transmitted by rodents among other means. Epoch Times article of today mentions the the men known to have been infected with it; all seem to have traveled. Reminds a lot of the AIDS crisis. The press then said it (HIV) was brought from Africa to Haiti, where gay men picked it up as sex tourists. Maybe this will be analogous. I think Duesberg is correct that HIV is a harmless retrovirus. AIDS was caused by heavy insult to the immune system. Maybe "monkeypox" will turn out to have a behavioral cause not related to a microbe. But you can bet your boots Fauci will have a drug asap to address it.
I remember AIDS in NYC back in the 80s. I remember people being worried about catching it. I remember telling a friend that most of the waiters in town were gay actors and if it was communicable we'd all already have it. Never spent anytime spinning on that one. Same w/ Covid. Less than 1% fatality for anyone under 70. I'm under 70 and when I got it I was sick (really sick) for 2 days. Whole thing's a joke.
The government is already planning on spending millions to either buy or option monkeypox vaccine, which already exists. I think the rationale is that it also works against smallpox.
common cold was rebranded. as were respiratory allergies. just like how malaria, typhus and cholera were rebranded as aids in africa. this program goes back a long way
As the story of COVID-19 was unfolding back in early 2020, demanding every moment of our attention, there was another historic health event that involved a viral relative. This unprecedented event strangely coincided with the Covid-19 crisis but did not register in the media landscape.
The 2020 media season began with warnings that the coming flu season was destined to be one of the worst in history. Even the CDC/NIAID Grand Poobah himself, Anthony Fauci, predicted early on that the 2020 flu season would be one of the worst in decades.
Despite those early forecasts, reports of the predicted flu rampage became scarce to non-existent by early March.
At the same time, the CDC scaled back its comprehensive ‘Flu View’ Surveillance System, its flagship offering for 22 years, and shifted its focus to another “Influenza-Like Illness”(ILI), Covid-19.
While the world was riveted by this ‘novel’ killer virus, the time-honored seasonal virus known as ‘the flu’ dropped to historic lows and virtually disappeared from the CDC’s surveillance system.
Was this a coincidence that our long-standing friend ‘the flu’ exited the stage at precisely the moment Covid entered?
How did this disappearance happen in such an abrupt fashion?
Thank you for this Allen. This reminds me of all the other about faces we've witnessed in the past two years, for example: "don't be a racist, come celebrate in chinatown" to "stay home, save lives", from "masks don't work" to "wear a mask, even outdoors alone", from " don't trust the Trump vaccine" to "everyone must get vaxxed, even children," and now from "worst flu season in history is coming", to "flu, what flu?"
The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.
There was no viral pandemic or epidemiological emergency in 2020- there was mass murder. They will use a similar template and roll this out again unless there are prosecutions for the crimes they committed.
They mandated the use of remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone which killed off hundreds of thousands of "Covid" (rebranded flu and bacterial pneumonia) patients. In May 2020 they added vancomycin to the toxic cocktail. A total assault to the kidneys.
All of this was (and much much more) done to create the mass hysteria event in order to hide the massive economic collapse of 2019 and hide the $13 trillion (so far) worth of bailouts AND to jump start the Pharma bio-security system as THE new economic driver of this bankrupt system.
Covid-19 is the biggest money laundering scheme in the history of this country.
99% of people falsely certified as having 'died from covid' actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and 'public health' despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.
The fact that there is no such thing as a "Covid death" is another minor problem here as SARSCoV2 itself is a computer generated fiction. Translation: No one has 'died from covid' as "covid" is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, flu and many other disease conditions.
In the US the "Covid death" number is cooked/manipulated due to how the CDC does their accounting as well as many other factors- an audit of the CDC mortality numbers themselves is required.
1) The first thing that must be addressed is "who were these people?" The average age of a "Covid death" was 80 in the US and 82 globally w/4 comorbidities. The majority of these people were from nursing homes, assisted living, hospice etc. Where did the vast majority of initial "Covid deaths" occur? Here in the US (and everywhere in the West- Milan, Madrid, London, Brussels, Montreal, Toronto, etc.) most, if not all, who died from "Covid" already had one foot in the grave and their death was put on fast forward through policies not some mythical virus.
What we had here in the US was a radical and mandatory shift in policies relating to hospitals, care homes and the overall social order. These new "policies" were mandated through various new and aberrant state "guidelines" which resulted in a concentrated death rate for a six week period in March/April in ONLY 8 states. Take that out of the equation and there is no death rate to talk about. Put (or keep) these policies in place and we will have this happen every year.
There is no doubt that protocol was designed to increase the death rate and continue to drive the fear. In the UK there was heavy use of Midazolam with morphine to ensure the numbers justified the panic. The elderly were targeted because the pensions had been pilfered long before and personal estates were being acquired to finance the care of these people. It seems clear that therapeutics were vilified in order the obtain emergency use of the serums which of course was the plan from the get go.
There was also gross negligence (beyond the usual) in numerous nursing homes that led to abandonment and medication alterations that turned these slow motion abattoirs into death houses. One of the remarkable things of note is that here in the US the "pandemic" was not widespread (which is supposed to be one of the defining features of a pandemic) but was in fact limited to very specific locations;
2) The faulty diagnosis of what is a "Covid death" did they die "with" or "from" Covid which is problematic for several reasons. In many cases an actual test was never done only a "presumed to be Covid" assessment was put forth. Add to this that when the tests were done PCR tests done with faulty specs (gene sequencing, cycle thresholds, annealing problems, faulty primers and so forth) were used. PCR can't diagnose anything in the first place and compounded with these problems they are useless and misleading;
3) Very few autopsies. Why were there so few autopsies done in the US? Why did they pass new mandates that halted autopsies for "Covid deaths?" This went against decades long protocol. They also changed decades old protocol on how death certificates should be filed;
4) Another way they inflated death counts was through hospital admissions and faulty PCR testing. So for example if one came in with a coronary condition you would be given a "Covid test" no matter what- all admissions required this- and then if you died while in the hospital you could have been listed as a "Covid death." This happened frequently throughout the year;
5) Home deaths is yet another way that figures were cooked. This was admitted point blank by Stephanie Buehle (NY Dept. of Health spokesperson) among others who stated that home deaths with no testing at all would be presumed "Covid deaths." This "guideline" was mandated through the NY Health Dept;
6) "Covid death counts were forged- CDC instructed officials to certify any death as "caused by" COVID if the decedent tested positive prior to passing or was suspected of having "C19", even if it wasn't the actual cause of death. Thus we have major misattribution. E.g., we have over 14,000 injury deaths listed in the "C19 death" total.
We're also seeing unexplained declines in other common death categories because so many have been attributed to "C19." The unprecedented broad definition of "C19" death has created huge fraud in "Covid death" counts;
7) Another way they inflated death counts was through hospital admissions and faulty PCR testing. This caused a huge spike in iatrogenic deaths caused by misattribution of "Covid" to incoming patients and the ensuing improper treatments applied e.g. ventilators and associated fentanyl dosages which killed thousands.
So for example if one came in with a coronary condition you would be given a "Covid test" no matter what- all admissions required this- and then if you died while in the hospital you could have been listed as a "Covid death." This happened frequently through the year.
The practice of PCR-testing hospital admissions who are asymptomatic for Covid using high Ct values undoubtedly caused deaths and unnecessary suffering.
This matters for several reasons. A pneumonia patient e.g. has a very good chance of surviving with correct support. However, if the patient tests ‘+’ for the non-existent pathogen an entirely different medical protocol goes into action and with this and there is little chance of survival.
The 'diagnosis' of "Covid" effectively permits dangerous protocols to be enacted that then increase the chance of mortality.
With regard to adoption of a new RT-PCR protocol for hospital admissions this also falsely manufactured death statistics for "Covid." Add to this how it was incentivized-$$$$$ while hospitals are under extreme financial duress. The US hospital system had it's worst financial quarter on record in the middle of a "pandemic." Administrators were under pressure to alleviate that financial pain and exploit all openings in the CARES Act.
None of this was accidental.
8) Lockdown impacts- too numerous to cite here.
In short whatever "excess deaths" which may have occurred anywhere can be attributed to people who didn't have to die but were KILLED due to the unnecessary use of ventilators, harsh toxic drugs, people dying prematurely do to lack of medical treatment, ill effects from the lockdowns and so on.
'The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.'
The only reliable data is all-cause mortality compared with the running average of the previous decade, and adjusted for an ageing and increasing population. Then it doesn’t matter whether deaths have been correctly attributed to CoVid or not.
The best example is Sweden, because its all-cause mortality isn’t skewed by deaths from effects of lockdowns and other measures.
It shows no increase above average. So no more people died in Sweden because of CoVid than would have died anyway. The follow-on to that is that no lives were saved because of the so-called vaccines - none to ‘save’. (This point is important, because the propaganda that the ‘vaccines’ save lives of the elderly and vulnerable, cannot be true, those lives will be lost anyway within a year or less from other causes if not CoVid.)
Even in other Countries above average is minimal and may be accounted for in deaths caused by Government measures, particularly denial of medical diagnosis & treatment to ‘free-up’ medical resources to deal with the never-arriving CoVid hospitalisation Tsunami, or people too afraid to seek urgent medical attention for life-threatening conditions: stroke, heart attack, for example.
We can also see death displacement, above average for 2020, below average for 2021, or first quarter of 2022.
In terms of global excess deaths, it is probable that the number is no higher than for influenza.
CT did the same. Lamont followed Cuomo almost to a tee. Always referring to what him and also MA Governor Baker were doing. That state also did the same as NY. I know as my daughter is a nurse in a Nursing Home in CT. For some reason only NY and NJ were highly criticized for doing this. Insanity and Lies. They reallly believe us all to be IDIOTS! Nor do ' THEY' care. CT has lots of money( ours) still sitting unused!!
I wonder why no one reported CO, WA & OR? I only ever heard about NY, MI, NJ. I never heard anything happening in my state of NM but the road whore governor here loved following the mandates & edicts of all the big boys in CA, NY, etc so it could well have happened here too
Covid succeeded in a large part because we live in an innumerate society. Most people are unable to understand that 1 million (ostensible!) deaths out of 331 million is insignificant. All of those zeros put their minds to sleep. Percents are a foreign concept. This also explains why your average person is not alarmed by double digit inflation. “It’s just a dollar more. Don’t worry about it!”
Last night I stopped by the bookstore to pick up a book and there was an event going on. All the attendees were masked. Then I drove across town to a medical freedom group meeting and no one was masked. We are living in two Americas.
Yeah - know more people that had bad Vax reactions than died from Covid. And we are not even really trying to find out who is vulnerable to Covid - biochemically I mean. We are just jabbing' kids right and left. My prediction is that we will see alot of myocarditis and cardiac damage from this.
Remember when the lockdowns and other bs started and people said that "this will crash the economy, you can't do this!"? Remember the response?
"The economy will come ROARING BACK by fall." (Circa Spring 2020)
So shut up and do it because we got this. I go could on and on, about children in school, about babies and toddlers, and every single fucken time, those evil bastards just dismissed every single perfectly valid claim with some stupid shit.
Every concern stated was justified even far beyond what we thought originally. Every dismissive response from all media and most politicians has been drastically and now becoming tragically wrong.
This is a conflagration. Set alight by our political leaders and the bureaucracies that do their dirty work outside of any accountability. We are still under unbelievable and life-threatening attack. When does this end?
It ends as part of a process, not a change in status quo with a clear line of demarcation. People like the author of the piece we're relying to are integral to that process.
I resent the very need for this particular procedural event. When I consider how all of these fine minds are being occupied with remediation of something that should never have happened in the first place, I mourn the fact that their efforts could have been applied to matters that would remedy the sufferings of humanity that are not owing to the psychopathy of a few greedy tyrants.
Weird, I must’ve missed the media’s coverage of the one millionth adverse reaction report submitted to VAERS (https://openvaers.com/covid-data) a few months ago. We’re already up to 1,261,147 as of May 6 and nearly 28,000 deaths—including 108 children (https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-summaries). I’m sure it was just an innocent oversight on the media’s part.
The media only report disinformation, aka Government press releases.
Yes, that’s straight from the menticide playbook:
• “Letter to the Menticided: A 12-Step Recovery Program” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-menticided-a-12-step)
Reason being is methodology for counting cases is fluid and ever-changing. CDC has been anything but sure-footed throughout its ridiculousness.
Right. I just defined the two immutable laws of Covidianism in a comment on my latest post as follows:
“It’s always COVID’s fault. Conversely, it’s never the injection’s fault.”
In England a review showed 14 different criteria were used to determine a ‘CoVid death’, depending on area and over time.
When a freedom of information request was made near the end of 2021 in England to ask how many attributed CoVid deaths where no underlying symptoms were noted, the answer was just over 17 000 for the period 01 January 2020 to 30 September 2021.
At the time supposedly 140 000 had died to date according to Govt published figures.
So by the same reckoning, probably that 1 million figure for USA is off by 90%.
Don’t forget all of the people who were intentionally hospicided for profits (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-governor-ron-desantis) and denied life-saving early treatments (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-scientifically-minded) to inflate the COVID death tally.
I think that’s the most horrible thing that they did: not allow treatment. That and blowing up lungs with ventilators. First, DO NO HARM!!
And if we consider VAERS is waaayy off in the actual numbers, the real count for deaths could be in the neighborhood of over a million.
Indeed, especially when you factor in other surveillance systems like EudraVigilance and the Yellow Card System.
It’s simple Algebra. If 100,000 people die tested for SARS-COV-2, the positivity rate is 10%. Ten thousand would count as a COVID-19 death even if they didn't have the disease. I have never seen this stat, but I bet positivity rates for people over 80 years old was closer to 50% (at times, in all age group, positivity rates were approaching 30%). Old and dying patients have a shitty immune system. So it makes sense that anyone over 80 and dying would probably test positive for a coronavirus even though they don't have the disease. Coronavirus was discovered in the ’60s. Coronavirus is likely as old as life is on the universe. The human body has millions of viruses living in our bodies. Without viruses, we couldn’t survive. A positive test confirms that PCR tests can identify a virus and multiply it thousands of times. That’s all the test does. The test cannot tell you if you have the disease COVID-19.
But here is another stat no one ever talks about. Globally almost 90% of all positive PCR tests were from the population <60 years old. Yet that age group accounted for <10% of all COVID-19 deaths. Let that sink in for a moment. Now remove pre-existing conditions from the less than 60-year-old age group. If you are healthy at any age, this virus is probably good for you. It helped create healthy antibodies for future coronavirus infections—our natural way of being vaccinated.
We can't stop here. The individuals responsible for the greatest crime against humanity in my lifetime need to be punished.
"But here is another stat no one ever talks about. Globally almost 90% of all positive PCR tests were from the population <60 years old. Yet that age group accounted for <10% of all COVID-19 deaths. Let that sink in for a moment. Now remove pre-existing conditions from the less than 60-year-old age group. If you are healthy at any age, this virus is probably good for you. It helped create healthy antibodies for future coronavirus infections—our natural way of being vaccinated."
👏👏👏👏👏
ABSOLUTELY. ALL OFFICIAL C19 COUNTERMEASURES WERE INTENDED TO HAVE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES TO RATCHET THE FEAR. The PCR TEST FRAUD is the baseless foundation of the plandemic pandemonium. The virus (if it existed before the injections) was purposely NOT ISOLATED to create the assay panels. The assay panels were purposely vague and even only used 1 of the 3 gene targets BEFORE being overclocked up to 43 cycles. Ensuring that "positive" tests would count as "cases" since seemingly the dumbest people go into public health and journalism.
...but will they? When will it start to happen.?...the cat is out of the bag, and so????.....I'm sure there is enough anger stewing amongst so many, the lid has to blow soon!
Almost no one has any idea about any of these numbers. I live in San Francisco. I ask people if they know any of this data. Nearly 100% of the people I talk to are clueless. Most people will not allow themselves to find out how stupid and gullible they are. Maybe they know, and they don't or won't ever admit it because at least they got their politician in and orange man bad out.
It is crazy, I know. I really never knew how many clueless, and disinterested people are living amongst us...it's mind-boggling. My family of origin included. My kids and I, not. Thank God...we seem to be the only ones who have any semblance of rational thought. Virtual signalling is in abundance though...yeah! ..shaking my head every day to try and make sense of it all. San Francisco is/was such an amazing city....my sister lives in CA with her her two adult kids, and again, seemingly oblivious to all this blatant nonsense. It is really stupefying.
Agreed. Fred and I discuss this daily. And they may never assimilate these facts. In fact when the opportunity arises to discuss this with people in the medical field its shocking how little known this is.
My wife is a Chief Medical Officer and doesn’t really know these numbers.
Just humour me, imagine if you will:. every media outlet in the country, right there on the screens, in unison proclames the truth (as we know it) and I see millions screaming "Nooooo" and going into melt down a la
post Trump's election. That was a picture I got after reading Eileen's and your post.
Why would people in the medical field want to "know" something that is so obviously disinformation? /s
"Coronavirus are likely as old as the universe". Not even close there.
Okay, now your are just being a dipshit. Just because they were discovered in the 60s doesn’t mean they haven’t been around since the beginning of time. Modern-day study of viruses goes back only to 1892. So now you will tell me you know how old the common cold is. STFU already.
A quote from Scientific America in the early 2000s.
“ In an episode of the classic 1950s television comedy The Honeymooners, Brooklyn bus driver Ralph Kramden loudly explains to his wife, Alice, “You know that I know how easy you get the virus.” Half a century ago, even regular folks like the Kramdens had some knowledge of viruses—as microscopic bringers of disease. Yet it is almost certain that they did not know exactly what a virus was. They were, and are, not alone.
For about 100 years, the scientific community has repeatedly changed its collective mind over what viruses are. First seen as poisons, then as life-forms, then biological chemicals, viruses today are thought of as being in a gray area between living and nonliving: they cannot replicate on their own but can do so in truly living cells and can also affect the behavior of their hosts profoundly. The categorization of viruses as nonliving during much of the modern era of biological science has had an unintended consequence: it has led most researchers to ignore viruses in the study of evolution. Finally, however, scientists are beginning to appreciate viruses as fundamental players in the history of life.
Deferring to ad hominem attacks doesn't belong on a forum like this
You want to censor me David? Have at it!
I hope I didn’t hurt your feelings.
No I don't want to censor you. When people deferr to ad hominem attacks what does that mean? For instance you saying that coronavirus has been around since the beginning of the universe as an example. If this virus has been around since the beginning of the Earth that is 4 billion years.
The universe is estimated at 14 billion years. There's 10 billion years unaccounted for in your explanation..
What are you talking about? The science around viruses in general is brand new. Are you suggesting that virus are something brand new as well and weren’t around prior to man. Everything I remember learning about viruses told me that they pre dated man by billions of years.
Viruses were discovered in the 60s?
Viruses are not "alive". If you want to speak with authority at least use language correctly.
Technically they are in a gray area, and the science seems undecided on this. I hardly think getting into an argument about whether or not, in the sense of me describing viruses taking up residence (living in our bodies), is the point of what I was stating.
Simple Google search turns up 380 trillion viruses on a person. You are off by a factor of 10 to the 6th power
When did I ever quantify how many viruses were present in humans?
You said human body has millions of viruses living on it or in it. I pointed out that you're simply off by a factor of ten to the sixth when there's 380 trillion viruses on the body. There's a considerable difference between millions and 380 trillion. I need to do more fact-checking before writing. That's all I'm pointing out. You'll have much more credibility if you do
Thanks. next time, I will make sure I'm more precise.
I was trying to say millions of different viruses, not the overall quantity of viruses. Perhaps you should read what Wolfgang Wodarg has to say about viruses. Then maybe you will understand the point I was trying to make.
Nothing Grey about them being alive. At least according to a talk I heard today by Matt ridley and his new book. Be more precise in your words especially if u want to talk science.
Can you spell it out for a dummy such as I? I don't get it. I think. 90% positives from <60 and yet they comprise <10% deaths. So?
I can see it mean 90% of deaths were in > 60.
Now remove pre-existing conditions from the >60.
I can see that means the 90% of deaths number would be greatly reduced.
So is it that you're saying simply that the stats indicate there were really far fewer deaths than the beat-up reports?
Sorry, it’s not super clear what I wrote.
Let me try again.
90% of all positive SARS-COV-2 tests were in less than 60 years old demographics. Yet that age group only accounted for ~10% of all the deaths (but many of these deaths were likely due to the person was already sick and unhealthy and they probably died from smothering else). That's all I was trying to convey.
I would like to know the positivity rate for the age group over 80 years old. If anyone has that data I would love to see it.
If you look outside of the US or you look in San Francisco the number of deaths <60 years old is maybe 2-3% if that. San Francisco is a small city and I would venture to say we have an extremely healthy and in shape population. The rent and mortgage payments alone will scare you into staying fit. 😊
Yep. You're looking for good data. Me too. It's a bit awesome to find we are of global significance isn't it? i.e. if you or I were to come up with a definitive list of reliable sources for covid data that'd be the first. Wow. I better start trying. I keep expecting someone else to do it for me....
:)
I'm just over it. I spent way too many hours for almost eighteen months pouring over the data and reading peer-reviewed scientific articles. I couldn't believe how many people in my immediate circle were so naive about what was happening. At this point, we will never know how many of the old and the sick did we push to their death beds too early because of the draconian measures the government enforced upon us. I personally believe most of them died a broken heart and from the government instilled fear they were under. But it makes sense that a large percent of these deaths were just pulled forward. In other words people who probably only had 12-18 months to live anyway.
We will have to see if the excess death numbers will adjust in the next couple of years. If they do, it should be fairly clear to see that the government interventions were the problem, not the virus. The problem is now healthy people less than 60 seem to be dropping dead at a furious rate. So this could potentially keep the excess numbers high. So it will be more critical to stratify the excess death numbers by age.
The primary mechanisms of harm were the official government interventions. Many countries have already gone back and adjudicated their deaths considerably lowering those attributed to actual C19. Even in doing so they are largely, if not primarily, scooping normal respiratory distress deaths due to comorbidities in to C19 containers. Age stratification still paints a clear but less and less so picture due to ACM impacts of the most dangerous medical product in history.
yep. and dropping dead many say because of the vax.
America was victimized by the biggest con in world history.
Question: Where do we go from here now that we see that the elites are not letting it go, but instead, they are using the waning pandemic as a spring board to enact broad social controls.
This aspect must now be recognized, challenged and defeated.
SCOTUS will now have its most solemn duty ever to reverse this authoritarian over-reach.
The Supreme Court is now as compromised as any other corrupt governmental entity. As well as subject to threats & intimidation since the leak
Haven't you noticed? They're now on to 'monkey pox.'
At this point it's hurting men who have sex with other men. It's transmitted by rodents among other means. Epoch Times article of today mentions the the men known to have been infected with it; all seem to have traveled. Reminds a lot of the AIDS crisis. The press then said it (HIV) was brought from Africa to Haiti, where gay men picked it up as sex tourists. Maybe this will be analogous. I think Duesberg is correct that HIV is a harmless retrovirus. AIDS was caused by heavy insult to the immune system. Maybe "monkeypox" will turn out to have a behavioral cause not related to a microbe. But you can bet your boots Fauci will have a drug asap to address it.
It's also completely treatable with no long term health effects. The media is ridiculous.
I remember AIDS in NYC back in the 80s. I remember people being worried about catching it. I remember telling a friend that most of the waiters in town were gay actors and if it was communicable we'd all already have it. Never spent anytime spinning on that one. Same w/ Covid. Less than 1% fatality for anyone under 70. I'm under 70 and when I got it I was sick (really sick) for 2 days. Whole thing's a joke.
They already have a vaccine for it. I bet they're going to push it on kids, at least. Just one more on the childhood schedule, no big deal. [sarcasm]
The smallpox vaccine is actually not all that benign. I'm sure this one won't be either. But people will probably go stampeding for it.
The government is already planning on spending millions to either buy or option monkeypox vaccine, which already exists. I think the rationale is that it also works against smallpox.
Thank you Mark, for your clear thinking and very large heart. Also, where did flu go??
Perhaps the flu was renamed? 🤔
Mmmm, you may be on to something!
common cold was rebranded. as were respiratory allergies. just like how malaria, typhus and cholera were rebranded as aids in africa. this program goes back a long way
hydroxichloroquine (tablets) has been used for malaria since before WWll and is now successfully used for cov. life can sometimes be really confusing.
my dad caught malaria took quinine on treasure island hospital back in the 50's
Your question is answered here:
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/where-did-the-flu-go/
As the story of COVID-19 was unfolding back in early 2020, demanding every moment of our attention, there was another historic health event that involved a viral relative. This unprecedented event strangely coincided with the Covid-19 crisis but did not register in the media landscape.
The 2020 media season began with warnings that the coming flu season was destined to be one of the worst in history. Even the CDC/NIAID Grand Poobah himself, Anthony Fauci, predicted early on that the 2020 flu season would be one of the worst in decades.
Despite those early forecasts, reports of the predicted flu rampage became scarce to non-existent by early March.
At the same time, the CDC scaled back its comprehensive ‘Flu View’ Surveillance System, its flagship offering for 22 years, and shifted its focus to another “Influenza-Like Illness”(ILI), Covid-19.
While the world was riveted by this ‘novel’ killer virus, the time-honored seasonal virus known as ‘the flu’ dropped to historic lows and virtually disappeared from the CDC’s surveillance system.
Was this a coincidence that our long-standing friend ‘the flu’ exited the stage at precisely the moment Covid entered?
How did this disappearance happen in such an abrupt fashion?
Thank you for this Allen. This reminds me of all the other about faces we've witnessed in the past two years, for example: "don't be a racist, come celebrate in chinatown" to "stay home, save lives", from "masks don't work" to "wear a mask, even outdoors alone", from " don't trust the Trump vaccine" to "everyone must get vaxxed, even children," and now from "worst flu season in history is coming", to "flu, what flu?"
It is not permitted to draw a distinction between with and of when it comes to COVID-involved deaths.
It is mandatory to draw a distinction between with and of when it comes to vaccine-involved deaths.
SCIENCE ™!
"Eternal shame" be damned; most of the perpetrators of this con deserve jail. A few deserve the ultimate penalty.
I would say that most of the perpetrators deserve the latter! I'm not the forgiving type.
The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.
There was no viral pandemic or epidemiological emergency in 2020- there was mass murder. They will use a similar template and roll this out again unless there are prosecutions for the crimes they committed.
They mandated the use of remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone which killed off hundreds of thousands of "Covid" (rebranded flu and bacterial pneumonia) patients. In May 2020 they added vancomycin to the toxic cocktail. A total assault to the kidneys.
All of this was (and much much more) done to create the mass hysteria event in order to hide the massive economic collapse of 2019 and hide the $13 trillion (so far) worth of bailouts AND to jump start the Pharma bio-security system as THE new economic driver of this bankrupt system.
Covid-19 is the biggest money laundering scheme in the history of this country.
99% of people falsely certified as having 'died from covid' actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and 'public health' despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.
The fact that there is no such thing as a "Covid death" is another minor problem here as SARSCoV2 itself is a computer generated fiction. Translation: No one has 'died from covid' as "covid" is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, flu and many other disease conditions.
In the US the "Covid death" number is cooked/manipulated due to how the CDC does their accounting as well as many other factors- an audit of the CDC mortality numbers themselves is required.
1) The first thing that must be addressed is "who were these people?" The average age of a "Covid death" was 80 in the US and 82 globally w/4 comorbidities. The majority of these people were from nursing homes, assisted living, hospice etc. Where did the vast majority of initial "Covid deaths" occur? Here in the US (and everywhere in the West- Milan, Madrid, London, Brussels, Montreal, Toronto, etc.) most, if not all, who died from "Covid" already had one foot in the grave and their death was put on fast forward through policies not some mythical virus.
What we had here in the US was a radical and mandatory shift in policies relating to hospitals, care homes and the overall social order. These new "policies" were mandated through various new and aberrant state "guidelines" which resulted in a concentrated death rate for a six week period in March/April in ONLY 8 states. Take that out of the equation and there is no death rate to talk about. Put (or keep) these policies in place and we will have this happen every year.
There is no doubt that protocol was designed to increase the death rate and continue to drive the fear. In the UK there was heavy use of Midazolam with morphine to ensure the numbers justified the panic. The elderly were targeted because the pensions had been pilfered long before and personal estates were being acquired to finance the care of these people. It seems clear that therapeutics were vilified in order the obtain emergency use of the serums which of course was the plan from the get go.
There was also gross negligence (beyond the usual) in numerous nursing homes that led to abandonment and medication alterations that turned these slow motion abattoirs into death houses. One of the remarkable things of note is that here in the US the "pandemic" was not widespread (which is supposed to be one of the defining features of a pandemic) but was in fact limited to very specific locations;
2) The faulty diagnosis of what is a "Covid death" did they die "with" or "from" Covid which is problematic for several reasons. In many cases an actual test was never done only a "presumed to be Covid" assessment was put forth. Add to this that when the tests were done PCR tests done with faulty specs (gene sequencing, cycle thresholds, annealing problems, faulty primers and so forth) were used. PCR can't diagnose anything in the first place and compounded with these problems they are useless and misleading;
3) Very few autopsies. Why were there so few autopsies done in the US? Why did they pass new mandates that halted autopsies for "Covid deaths?" This went against decades long protocol. They also changed decades old protocol on how death certificates should be filed;
4) Another way they inflated death counts was through hospital admissions and faulty PCR testing. So for example if one came in with a coronary condition you would be given a "Covid test" no matter what- all admissions required this- and then if you died while in the hospital you could have been listed as a "Covid death." This happened frequently throughout the year;
5) Home deaths is yet another way that figures were cooked. This was admitted point blank by Stephanie Buehle (NY Dept. of Health spokesperson) among others who stated that home deaths with no testing at all would be presumed "Covid deaths." This "guideline" was mandated through the NY Health Dept;
6) "Covid death counts were forged- CDC instructed officials to certify any death as "caused by" COVID if the decedent tested positive prior to passing or was suspected of having "C19", even if it wasn't the actual cause of death. Thus we have major misattribution. E.g., we have over 14,000 injury deaths listed in the "C19 death" total.
We're also seeing unexplained declines in other common death categories because so many have been attributed to "C19." The unprecedented broad definition of "C19" death has created huge fraud in "Covid death" counts;
7) Another way they inflated death counts was through hospital admissions and faulty PCR testing. This caused a huge spike in iatrogenic deaths caused by misattribution of "Covid" to incoming patients and the ensuing improper treatments applied e.g. ventilators and associated fentanyl dosages which killed thousands.
So for example if one came in with a coronary condition you would be given a "Covid test" no matter what- all admissions required this- and then if you died while in the hospital you could have been listed as a "Covid death." This happened frequently through the year.
The practice of PCR-testing hospital admissions who are asymptomatic for Covid using high Ct values undoubtedly caused deaths and unnecessary suffering.
This matters for several reasons. A pneumonia patient e.g. has a very good chance of surviving with correct support. However, if the patient tests ‘+’ for the non-existent pathogen an entirely different medical protocol goes into action and with this and there is little chance of survival.
The 'diagnosis' of "Covid" effectively permits dangerous protocols to be enacted that then increase the chance of mortality.
With regard to adoption of a new RT-PCR protocol for hospital admissions this also falsely manufactured death statistics for "Covid." Add to this how it was incentivized-$$$$$ while hospitals are under extreme financial duress. The US hospital system had it's worst financial quarter on record in the middle of a "pandemic." Administrators were under pressure to alleviate that financial pain and exploit all openings in the CARES Act.
None of this was accidental.
8) Lockdown impacts- too numerous to cite here.
In short whatever "excess deaths" which may have occurred anywhere can be attributed to people who didn't have to die but were KILLED due to the unnecessary use of ventilators, harsh toxic drugs, people dying prematurely do to lack of medical treatment, ill effects from the lockdowns and so on.
'The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.'
Yes.
The only reliable data is all-cause mortality compared with the running average of the previous decade, and adjusted for an ageing and increasing population. Then it doesn’t matter whether deaths have been correctly attributed to CoVid or not.
The best example is Sweden, because its all-cause mortality isn’t skewed by deaths from effects of lockdowns and other measures.
It shows no increase above average. So no more people died in Sweden because of CoVid than would have died anyway. The follow-on to that is that no lives were saved because of the so-called vaccines - none to ‘save’. (This point is important, because the propaganda that the ‘vaccines’ save lives of the elderly and vulnerable, cannot be true, those lives will be lost anyway within a year or less from other causes if not CoVid.)
Even in other Countries above average is minimal and may be accounted for in deaths caused by Government measures, particularly denial of medical diagnosis & treatment to ‘free-up’ medical resources to deal with the never-arriving CoVid hospitalisation Tsunami, or people too afraid to seek urgent medical attention for life-threatening conditions: stroke, heart attack, for example.
We can also see death displacement, above average for 2020, below average for 2021, or first quarter of 2022.
In terms of global excess deaths, it is probable that the number is no higher than for influenza.
Mark, whenever I read your dispaches, I get this calm feeling, like I can see for miles around me.
Seems to have gone exactly as planned. Wait until you see what these killers have up their sleeves for you with their 'Climate Change' lockdowns.
Dear God, Please Give Us A Reprieve!!! Pray like your life Depends on it... Because It Does!!!
CT did the same. Lamont followed Cuomo almost to a tee. Always referring to what him and also MA Governor Baker were doing. That state also did the same as NY. I know as my daughter is a nurse in a Nursing Home in CT. For some reason only NY and NJ were highly criticized for doing this. Insanity and Lies. They reallly believe us all to be IDIOTS! Nor do ' THEY' care. CT has lots of money( ours) still sitting unused!!
Not a stretch for them to believe @ least “most” are idiots, as the past 2+ years have proven….
The nursing home debacle also happened in Colorado under Governor Jared Polis.
Disgusting. Oregon and Washington too.
I wonder why no one reported CO, WA & OR? I only ever heard about NY, MI, NJ. I never heard anything happening in my state of NM but the road whore governor here loved following the mandates & edicts of all the big boys in CA, NY, etc so it could well have happened here too
ny nursing homes were shipping people to ct so they could die there!
Wow. Did Not know that but it makes sense.
Covid succeeded in a large part because we live in an innumerate society. Most people are unable to understand that 1 million (ostensible!) deaths out of 331 million is insignificant. All of those zeros put their minds to sleep. Percents are a foreign concept. This also explains why your average person is not alarmed by double digit inflation. “It’s just a dollar more. Don’t worry about it!”
So true.
Last night I stopped by the bookstore to pick up a book and there was an event going on. All the attendees were masked. Then I drove across town to a medical freedom group meeting and no one was masked. We are living in two Americas.
Yeah - know more people that had bad Vax reactions than died from Covid. And we are not even really trying to find out who is vulnerable to Covid - biochemically I mean. We are just jabbing' kids right and left. My prediction is that we will see alot of myocarditis and cardiac damage from this.
Flu was renamed “Covid.” 🤔
Remember when the lockdowns and other bs started and people said that "this will crash the economy, you can't do this!"? Remember the response?
"The economy will come ROARING BACK by fall." (Circa Spring 2020)
So shut up and do it because we got this. I go could on and on, about children in school, about babies and toddlers, and every single fucken time, those evil bastards just dismissed every single perfectly valid claim with some stupid shit.
Every concern stated was justified even far beyond what we thought originally. Every dismissive response from all media and most politicians has been drastically and now becoming tragically wrong.
This is a conflagration. Set alight by our political leaders and the bureaucracies that do their dirty work outside of any accountability. We are still under unbelievable and life-threatening attack. When does this end?
It ends as part of a process, not a change in status quo with a clear line of demarcation. People like the author of the piece we're relying to are integral to that process.
I resent the very need for this particular procedural event. When I consider how all of these fine minds are being occupied with remediation of something that should never have happened in the first place, I mourn the fact that their efforts could have been applied to matters that would remedy the sufferings of humanity that are not owing to the psychopathy of a few greedy tyrants.